npm package report

Is @apollo/sandbox safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.8

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-w87v-7w53-wwxv, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-w87v-7w53-wwxv

HIGHCVE-2025-59845

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in Apollo’s Embedded Sandbox and Embedded Explorer.

Affected
< 2.7.2
Fixed in
2.7.2
Weakness
CWE-346
Published
2025-09-26
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

6 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-09-26. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @apollo/sandbox safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ