npm package report

Is @angular/service-worker safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qxh6-94w6-9r5p, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qxh6-94w6-9r5p

HIGHCVE-2026-54264

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the @angular/service-worker package of the Angular framework. When the Service Worker fetches assets, it preserves metadata (such as headers) from the original request. However, on cross-origin redirects, the Service Worker fails to strip sensitive headers, violating the Fetch redirect algorithm.

Affected
>= 22.0.0-next.0, < 22.0.1, >=22.0.0-next.0, <22.0.1
Fixed in
22.0.1
Weakness
CWE-200
Published
2026-06-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

1 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:27 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @angular/service-worker safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ