npm package report

Is @ai-sdk/provider-utils safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
5.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.60%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.9

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-866g-f22w-33x8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-866g-f22w-33x8

LOWCVE-2026-8769

Versions of @ai-sdk/provider-utils before 3.0.28, from 4.0.0 before 4.0.33, and from 5.0.0 before 5.0.1 are vulnerable to uncontrolled resource consumption. The createJsonResponseHandler, createJsonErrorResponseHandler, and createStatusCodeErrorResponseHandler functions in packages/provider-utils/src/response-handler.ts read response bodies without a shared size limit, allowing a remote attacker w

Affected
< 3.0.28
Fixed in
3.0.28
Weakness
CWE-400
Published
2026-05-18
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:30 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-18. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @ai-sdk/provider-utils safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ