npm package report

Is @aedart/support safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
3.7

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wwxh-74fx-33c6, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wwxh-74fx-33c6

LOWCVE-2023-30857

Possible prototype pollution for the MetadataRecord, when merged with a base class' metadata object, in meta decorator from the @aedart/support package.

Affected
< 0.6.1
Fixed in
0.6.1
Weakness
CWE-1321
Published
2023-05-01
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:51 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-05-01. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @aedart/support safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ