npm package report

Is @actions/artifact safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
3.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.1

CyberXYZ composite, and a working exploit is published

fig. 01 — GHSA-6q32-hq47-5qq3, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-6q32-hq47-5qq3

HIGHCVE-2024-42471

Versions of actions/artifact before 2.1.7 are vulnerable to arbitrary file write when using downloadArtifactInternal, downloadArtifactPublic, or streamExtractExternal for extracting a specifically crafted artifact that contains path traversal filenames.

Affected
>= 2.0.0, < 2.1.2
Fixed in
2.1.2
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2024-09-03
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// dependencies

13 direct, 5 carrying known advisories, worst HIGH

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:42 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-09-03. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @actions/artifact safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ