npm package report

Is @quasar/cli safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

12 direct dependencies

6 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

0 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

    Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
    // ai model usage

    Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


    cvss
    0.0
    high

    severity out of 10

    epss
    not scored

    chance of exploitation in 30 days

    xyz score
    not scored

    CyberXYZ composite out of 10

    fig. 01 — GHSA-fh39-c73x-5pjv, the advisory selected below

    // 1 advisories

    GHSA-fh39-c73x-5pjv

    HIGHCVE-2026-106105

    The @quasar/ssl-certificate development utility caches a combined PEM containing a generated private key and certificate without explicitly restricting its filesystem permissions. On systems with a typical process umask, the PEM can be readable by other local users. A local attacker with filesystem access could copy and reuse the private key to impersonate a development TLS endpoint in an environment that trusts the certificate.

    The generated certificate was also unnecessarily CA-capable and included broad key usages beyond its localhost HTTPS purpose. Its IPv6 loopback entry was encoded as a DNS name rather than an IP subject alternative name.

    The remediation writes and repairs the cached PEM with owner-only permissions on supported platforms, generates a non-CA server-auth leaf certificate with constrained key usage, corrects the IPv6 loopback SAN, and bases cache expiry on content modification time so permission metadata changes cannot extend the certificate lifetime. This issue does not expose the key remotely by itself; exploitation requires another local user to be able to read the cached PEM file.

    // cvss v4.0 vector

    CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

    Attack vector
    Local
    Attack complexity
    Low
    Attack requirements
    None
    Privileges required
    Low
    User interaction
    None
    Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
    High
    Integrity (vulnerable system)
    High
    Availability (vulnerable system)
    None
    Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
    None
    Integrity (subsequent systems)
    None
    Availability (subsequent systems)
    None

    Checked 2026-10-07 at 18:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-10-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

    Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.