npm package report

Is @pdfme/common safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-pgx6-7jcq-2qff, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-pgx6-7jcq-2qff

MODERATE

The getB64BasePdf function in @pdfme/common fetches arbitrary URLs via fetch() without any validation when basePdf is a non-data-URI string and window is defined. An attacker who can control the basePdf field of a template (e.g., through a web application that accepts user-supplied templates) can force the server or client to make requests to arbitrary internal or external endpoints, enabling Serv

Affected
>=0, <5.5.10, <= 5.5.9
Fixed in
5.5.10
Weakness
CWE-918
Published
2026-03-20
Source
osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:48 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-20. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @pdfme/common safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ