npm package report

Is @openzeppelin/confidential-contracts safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-hqf9-8xv5-x8xw

MODERATECVE-2026-73645

The ERC7984 contract tracks total supply using a confidential euint64 value. If a call to the internal mint function would result in the total supply overflowing, the call fails silently. The wrap and onTransferReceived functions in ERC7984ERC20Wrapper assume that mint won't fail silently and do not check the return value. If the mint function fails silently, users do not receive the confidential

Affected
<= 0.3.0, >=0, <0.3.1
Fixed in
0.3.1
Weakness
CWE-190
Published
2026-01-05
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-01-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @openzeppelin/confidential-contracts safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ