npm package report

Is @ensdomains/ens-contracts safe?

This package is in our known-malicious corpus. Details below.

Flagged as malicious

  • credential_stealer, affects all versions
cvss
4.9

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rrxv-q8m4-wch3, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rrxv-q8m4-wch3

MODERATECVE-2023-38698

According to the documentation, controllers are allowed to register new domains and extend the expiry of existing domains, but they cannot change the ownership or reduce the expiration time of existing domains. However, a preliminary analysis suggests that an attacker-controlled controller may be able to reduce the expiration time of existing domains due to an integer overflow in the renew functio

Affected
<= 0.0.21
Fixed in
0.0.22
Weakness
CWE-190
Published
2023-08-01
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-02-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @ensdomains/ens-contracts safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ