npm package report

Is @cyclonedx/cyclonedx-library safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.90%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-38gf-rh2w-gmj7, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-38gf-rh2w-gmj7

HIGHCVE-2024-34345

XML External entity injections could be possible, when running the provided XML Validator on arbitrary input.

Affected
= 6.7.0
Fixed in
6.7.1
Weakness
CWE-611
Published
2024-05-08
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-05-08. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @cyclonedx/cyclonedx-library safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ