npm package report

Is @backstage/backend-defaults safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rq6q-wr2q-7pgp, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rq6q-wr2q-7pgp

HIGHCVE-2026-24046

Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to:

Affected
< 0.12.2
Fixed in
0.12.2
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2026-01-21
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-01-21. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @backstage/backend-defaults safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ