npm package report

Is @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server safe?

5 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-78x9-fhhx-v2g6, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-78x9-fhhx-v2g6

MODERATECVE-2026-73846

The response cache derives its key from an ambiguous string serialization of the request parameters. canonicalizeParams joins sorted ${key}=${value} pairs with & and does not escape &, =, or the | field separators used in buildCacheKey. Two different logical parameter sets can therefore serialize to the same key and share one cache entry. Because the cached value is whatever the upstream returned

Affected
< 0.4.112
Fixed in
0.4.112
Weakness
CWE-345
Published
2026-09-03
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-03. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @aborruso/ckan-mcp-server safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ