maven package report

Is ruby safe?

2 known vulnerabilities.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — BIT-ruby-min-2020-10933, the advisory selected below

// advisories

BIT-ruby-min-2020-10933

UNKNOWN

An issue was discovered in Ruby 2.5.x through 2.5.7, 2.6.x through 2.6.5, and 2.7.0. If a victim calls BasicSocket#readnonblock(requestedsize, buffer, exception: false), the method resizes the buffer to fit the requested size, but no data is copied. Thus, the buffer string provides the previous value of the heap. This may expose possibly sensitive data from the interpreter.

Affected
>=2.5.0, >=2.6.0, >=2.7.0
Fixed in
not stated
Published
2024-03-06
Source
osv
// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-03-06. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is ruby safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ