maven package report

Is org.xwiki.contrib.plantuml:macro-plantuml-macro safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.4

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-42fc-7w97-8vrc, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-42fc-7w97-8vrc

MODERATECVE-2026-42140

The [PlantUML Macro](https://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/PlantUML+Macro) is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The macro allows users to specify an alternative PlantUML server via the server parameter. However, the application does not validate the supplied URL. An attacker can supply an internal IP address or a malicious external URL. The XWiki server will attempt

Affected
< 2.4.1
Fixed in
2.4.1
Weakness
CWE-918
Published
2026-05-05
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:57 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.xwiki.contrib.plantuml:macro-plantuml-macro safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ