maven package report

Is org.wildfly.core:wildfly-server safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MEDIUM.

cvss
6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
2.2

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qr6x-62gq-4ccp

MEDIUMCVE-2025-23367

A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. The

Affected
>=0, <27.0.1, >=28.0.0, <31.0.1
Fixed in
27.0.1.Final
Weakness
CWE-284
Published
2025-01-31
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:33 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-01-31. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.wildfly.core:wildfly-server safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ