maven package report

Is org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 safe?

org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven) has 4 known vulnerabilities, the worst rated CRITICAL. Upgrade to 2.0.14 or later to clear all of them. No malicious-package signal is recorded.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    dependents not yet indexed for this ecosystem

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


      cvss
      9.0
      critical

      CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

      epss
      100.0%
      critical

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 100th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      7.3
      high

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-7rjr-3q55-vv33, the advisory selected below

      // 4 advisories

      GHSA-7rjr-3q55-vv33

      CRITICALGitHub ratingexploited in the wildCVE-2021-45046

      The fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations.

      Full advisory text at GitHub advisory or NVD.

      // cvss v3.1 vector

      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      High
      Privileges required
      None
      User interaction
      None
      Scope
      Changed
      Confidentiality
      High
      Integrity
      High
      Availability
      High
      // questions
      Is org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 safe to install?

      CyberXYZ does not call a package safe in absolute terms. It records 4 known vulnerabilities for org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven), the worst rated CRITICAL, and no malicious-package signal. Whether it is acceptable depends on the version you run.

      Does org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 have known vulnerabilities?

      Yes. CyberXYZ records 4 known vulnerabilities for org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven), the worst rated CRITICAL. They are GHSA-7rjr-3q55-vv33, GHSA-xxfh-x98p-j8fr, GHSA-p6xc-xr62-6r2g, GHSA-8489-44mv-ggj8.

      Which version of org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 should I use?

      2.0.14 or later clears every advisory recorded for org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven). Check the release you pick before installing it.

      How do I check org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 before installing?

      Search org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 in CyberXYZ Check at https://cyberxyz.io/check?q=org.ops4j.pax.logging%3Apax-logging-log4j2. The xyz Scanner checks a project's dependencies, and CyberXYZ Proxy checks each package as it is installed.


      Checked 2026-11-14 at 10:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-01-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.