maven package report

Is org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-xxfh-x98p-j8fr, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-xxfh-x98p-j8fr

CRITICAL

Remote Code Execution.

Affected
>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11, < 1.11.10
Fixed in
2.0.11
Published
2021-12-10
Source
github

GHSAreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:50 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-01-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ