maven package report

Is org.opensaml:opensaml safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
2.3%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qwwj-qj3f-9hv7, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qwwj-qj3f-9hv7

MODERATECVE-2011-1411

Shibboleth OpenSAML library 2.4.x before 2.4.3 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and IdP before 2.3.2, allows remote attackers to forge messages and bypass authentication via an "XML Signature wrapping attack."

Affected
>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.1, >= 2.4.0, < 2.4.3
Fixed in
2.5.1
Weakness
CWE-287
Published
2022-05-17
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:46 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.opensaml:opensaml safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ