maven package report

Is org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-auth-webauthn safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-gf8h-gq53-288j, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-gf8h-gq53-288j

CRITICALCVE-2026-62263

The GHSA-6c99-87fr-6q7r fix wrapped WebAuthn authenticator deserialization in an ObjectInputFilter meant to allow only AuthenticatorImpl, but it short-circuits to ALLOWED for any object at stream depth > 1. Because the Java serialization filter is consulted for every class in the graph (and depth == 1 only for the root's concrete class), the allowlist constrains only the root and leaves the entire

Affected
<= 16.1.1
Fixed in
16.1.2
Weakness
CWE-502
Published
2026-07-24
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-auth-webauthn safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ