maven package report

Is org.opendaylight.mdsal:mdsal-artifacts safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-hv38-h5pj-c96j, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-hv38-h5pj-c96j

HIGHCVE-2024-46942

In OpenDaylight Model-Driven Service Abstraction Layer (MD-SAL) through 13.0.1, a controller with a follower role can configure flow entries in an OpenDaylight clustering deployment.

Affected
<= 13.0.1
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-285
Published
2024-09-16
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-09-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.opendaylight.mdsal:mdsal-artifacts safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ