maven package report

Is org.neo4j:neo4j-enterprise safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.9%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-h5f5-rj4r-42f6, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-h5f5-rj4r-42f6

CRITICALCVE-2018-18389

Due to incorrect access control in Neo4j Enterprise Database Server 3.4.x before 3.4.9, the setting of LDAP for authentication with STARTTLS, and System Account for authorization, allows an attacker to log into the server by sending any valid username with an arbitrary password.

Affected
>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.9
Fixed in
3.4.9
Weakness
CWE-287
Published
2018-10-17
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:56 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2018-10-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.neo4j:neo4j-enterprise safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ