maven package report

Is org.keycloak:keycloak-server safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-pq65-77rc-7r8c, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-pq65-77rc-7r8c

MODERATECVE-2026-9796

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated administrator with the manage-clients role can exploit a Time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in the name-based admin role checks. This allows the attacker to escalate their privileges to realm-admin for all users within the realm, granting them extensive control over the system. The composite role relationship persists even after the a

Affected
< 26.6.4
Fixed in
26.6.4
Weakness
CWE-367
Published
2026-05-28
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:50 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-28. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.keycloak:keycloak-server safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ