maven package report

Is org.keycloak:keycloak-quarkus-dist safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-q8hq-4h99-fj7x, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-q8hq-4h99-fj7x

HIGHCVE-2025-11419

Keycloak is vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack due to the default JDK setting that permits Client-Initiated Renegotiation in TLS 1.2. An unauthenticated remote attacker can repeatedly initiate TLS renegotiation requests to exhaust server CPU resources, making the service unavailable. Immediate mitigation is available by setting the -Djdk.tls.rejectClientInitiatedRenegotiation=true Java

Affected
< 26.0.16
Fixed in
26.0.16
Weakness
CWE-400
Published
2025-10-27
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:56 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-12-02. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.keycloak:keycloak-quarkus-dist safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ