maven package report

Is org.keycloak:keycloak-model-jpa safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.7

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-54f3-c6hg-865h, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-54f3-c6hg-865h

HIGHCVE-2023-6563

An unconstrained memory consumption vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak. It can be triggered in environments which have millions of offline tokens (> 500,000 users with each having at least 2 saved sessions). If an attacker creates two or more user sessions and then open the "consents" tab of the admin User Interface, the UI attempts to load a huge number of offline client sessions leading to

Affected
< 21.0.0
Fixed in
21.0.0
Weakness
CWE-770
Published
2023-12-14
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-12-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.keycloak:keycloak-model-jpa safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ