maven package report

Is org.jvnet.hudson.plugins:dry safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-63cj-3r94-234v, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-63cj-3r94-234v

MODERATECVE-2017-1000103

The custom Details view of the Static Analysis Utilities based DRY Plugin, was vulnerable to a persisted cross-site scripting vulnerability: Malicious users able to influence the input to this plugin could insert arbitrary HTML into this view.

Affected
<= 2.48
Fixed in
2.49
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2022-05-17
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.jvnet.hudson.plugins:dry safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ