maven package reportIs org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-deploy safe ? 1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.
// reach 0 direct dependencies
none carry a known advisory
0 packages depend on it
an advisory here reaches each of them
// ai model usage Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.
epss chance of exploitation in 30 days, 91st percentile of all CVEs
xyz score CyberXYZ composite out of 10
fig. 01 — GHSA-j6qj-j888-vvgq, the advisory selected below
// 1 advisories GHSA-j6qj-j888-vvgq If the ${jetty.base} directory or the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory is a symlink (soft link in Linux), the contents of the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory may be deployed as a static web application, exposing the content of the directory for download. LOW // impact If the ${jetty.base} directory or the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory is a symlink (soft link in Linux), the contents of the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory may be deployed as a static web application, exposing the content of the directory for download.
For example, the problem manifests in the following ${jetty.base}:
demo-base/
├── etc
├── lib
├── resources
├── start.d
├── deploy
│ └── async-rest.war
└── webapps -> deploy // workarounds Do not use a symlink
// cvss v3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Attack vector Network
Attack complexity Low
Privileges required High
User interaction None
Scope Unchanged
Confidentiality Low
Integrity None
Availability None Checked 2026-09-28 at 19:50 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-04-06. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.
Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days. Report an issue with this page