maven package report

Is org.eclipse.californium:scandium safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.60%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p72g-cgh9-ghjg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p72g-cgh9-ghjg

HIGHCVE-2022-39368

Failing handshakes didn't cleanup counters for throttling. In consequence the threshold may get reached and will not be released again. The results in permanently dropping records. The issues was reported for certificate based handshakes, but it can't be excluded, that this happens also for PSK based handshakes. It generally affects client and server as well.

Affected
>= 2.7.0, < 2.7.4, >= 3.0.0, < 3.7.0
Fixed in
2.7.4
Weakness
CWE-404
Published
2022-11-09
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:53 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-11-09. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.eclipse.californium:scandium safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ