maven package report

Is org.apache.pulsar:pulsar-client safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.9

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-c5fp-x2h5-vjv7, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-c5fp-x2h5-vjv7

MODERATECVE-2022-33681

Delayed TLS hostname verification in the Pulsar Java Client and the Pulsar Proxy make each client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. Connections from the Pulsar Java Client to the Pulsar Broker/Proxy and connections from the Pulsar Proxy to the Pulsar Broker are vulnerable. Authentication data is sent before verifying the server’s TLS certificate matches the hostname, which means authentica

Affected
>= 2.9.0, < 2.9.3, >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.4, = 2.10.0, < 2.7.5
Fixed in
2.9.3
Weakness
CWE-295
Published
2022-09-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:56 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-09-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.apache.pulsar:pulsar-client safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ