maven package report

Is org.apache.james.protocols:protocols-imap safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

8.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.90%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-56jp-w6vw-j3jw, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-56jp-w6vw-j3jw

HIGHCVE-2024-37358

Similarly to CVE-2024-34055, Apache James is vulnerable to denial of service through the abuse of IMAP literals from both authenticated and unauthenticated users, which could be used to cause unbounded memory allocation and very long computations

Affected: < 3.7.6, >= 3.8.0, < 3.8.2
Fixed in: 3.7.6
Weakness: CWE-20
Published: 2025-02-06
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:54 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-02-06. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is org.apache.james.protocols:protocols-imap safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ