maven package report

Is org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-common safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.9

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-gxq5-79m2-gvvq, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-gxq5-79m2-gvvq

MODERATECVE-2022-32531

The Apache Bookkeeper Java Client (before 4.14.6 and also 4.15.0) does not close the connection to the bookkeeper server when TLS hostname verification fails. This leaves the bookkeeper client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. The problem affects BookKeeper client prior to versions 4.14.6 and 4.15.1.

Affected
= 4.15.0, < 4.14.6
Fixed in
4.15.1
Weakness
CWE-295
Published
2022-12-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:49 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-12-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-common safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ