maven package report

Is nl.nl-portal:besluiten safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      medium

      severity out of 10

      epss
      0.00%
      low

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 25th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-qpm9-h556-mwxm, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-qpm9-h556-mwxm

      MODERATECVE-2026-49463
      // impact

      In versions up to and including 3.0.0, two parts of the GraphQL API returned data without checking whether the data belonged to the logged-in user:

      • Document content. A logged-in user could download the raw content of any document by its ID, regardless of who owned it. The resolver has lacked an authentication parameter since the initial commit of the project (2022-11-22) — so every version of nl.nl-portal:documenten-api ever published is affected (the earliest one on Maven Central is 0.2.2.RELEASE, published 2023-08-31).
      • Decisions (besluiten). A logged-in user could list, search, and read decision records — including their audit trails and the documents attached to them — for any user. The list query also accepted filters (decision type, identification, responsible organisation, related case), which made it easy to enumerate decisions across the user base. The besluiten module was introduced in the 1.5.x release line (commit 9229460b, 2024-08-19), so versions of nl.nl-portal:besluiten from 1.5.0 through 3.0.0 are affected.

      Decisions and their attachments often contain sensitive personal data (decisions on benefits, permits, objections, and similar), so the confidentiality impact is high. The two endpoints also chain naturally: once an attacker has discovered another user's document IDs by enumerating decisions, they can pull those documents' contents through the document endpoint.

      // why these two findings are reported together

      They share the same root cause and the same shape. Both GraphQL resolvers were declared without an authentication parameter on the method signature, which meant the framework never bound the authenticated user into the resolver and the resolver therefore could not perform per-user authorization checks. The fix pattern is the same — bind the authenticated principal into the resolver, or remove the resolver entirely. And in practice the two endpoints reinforce each other as a chain (enumerate via decisions, exfiltrate via documents), so they describe a single end-to-end weakness in the GraphQL surface.

      // patches

      Upgrade to 3.0.1 or later.

      • nl.nl-portal:documenten-api — the resolver now declares the authentication parameter, so the framework binds the authenticated user into the call path. Fix commit: 32e0ebdf — "Add auth on DocumentContentQuery.kt".
      • nl.nl-portal:besluiten — the entire besluiten module is removed in 3.0.1. Consumers who rely on the besluiten functionality must implement a replacement at the application layer with explicit per-user authorization on every resolver before upgrading. Fix commit: f592af1b — "Removal of Besluiten API".
      // workarounds

      For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately:

      • Block the following GraphQL operations at the API gateway: getDocumentContent, getBesluiten, getBesluit, getBesluitAuditTrails, getBesluitAuditTrail, getBesluitDocumenten, getBesluitDocument.
      • If per-operation blocking is not possible, block the besluiten module's GraphQL types entirely and block the document-content query.
      // technical details
      • nl.nlportal.documentenapi.graphql.DocumentContentQuery.getDocumentContent(documentApi, id) did not declare a CommonGroundAuthentication parameter on the resolver. The authenticated principal was therefore not bound into the call path and document content could be retrieved without the resolver participating in user-scoped authorization. Patched by adding authentication: CommonGroundAuthentication to the resolver signature, so Spring's argument resolution rejects unauthenticated invocations of the query.
      • nl.nlportal.besluiten.graphql.BesluitenQuery exposed six GraphQL operations — getBesluiten, getBesluit, getBesluitAuditTrails, getBesluitAuditTrail, getBesluitDocumenten, getBesluitDocument — none of which declared a CommonGroundAuthentication parameter. In particular, getBesluiten accepted filter arguments (besluitType, identificatie, verantwoordelijkeOrganisatie, zaak, pageNumber) but performed no user scoping, allowing callers to enumerate besluit records across users. The point-lookup operations (getBesluit, getBesluitAuditTrail, getBesluitDocument) returned data for any UUID without ownership checks. The fix is the removal of BesluitenQuery, BesluitenAutoConfiguration, and the integration test, and the autoconfiguration entry has been unwired from the application defaults.
      // credits

      Discovered during the nl-portal-backend-libraries penetration testing engagement (phase 1, May 2026). Vendor attribution to be added before publication.

      // cvss v3.1 vector

      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Privileges required
      Low
      User interaction
      None
      Scope
      Unchanged
      Confidentiality
      High
      Integrity
      None
      Availability
      None

      Checked 2026-09-26 at 01:06 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-08. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.