maven package report

Is net.i2p.crypto:eddsa safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.10%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p53j-g8pw-4w5f, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p53j-g8pw-4w5f

MODERATECVE-2020-36843

The implementation of EdDSA in EdDSA-Java (aka ed25519-java) through 0.3.0 exhibits signature malleability and does not satisfy the SUF-CMA (Strong Existential Unforgeability under Chosen Message Attacks) property. This allows attackers to create new valid signatures different from previous signatures for a known message.

Affected
<= 0.3.0
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-347
Published
2025-03-13
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:33 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-03-13. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is net.i2p.crypto:eddsa safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ