maven package report

Is io.spinnaker.clouddriver:clouddriver-artifacts safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-8r8j-gfhg-fw38, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-8r8j-gfhg-fw38

CRITICALCVE-2026-25534

Spinnaker updated URL Validation logic on user input to provide sanitation on user inputted URLs for clouddriver. However, they missed that Java URL objects do not correctly handle underscores on parsing. This led to a bypass of the previous CVE (CVE-2025-61916) through the use of carefully crafted URLs. Note, Spinnaker found this not just in that CVE, but in the existing URL validations in Orc

Affected
>= 2025.3.0, < 2025.3.1
Fixed in
2025.3.1
Weakness
CWE-918
Published
2026-03-16
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:54 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is io.spinnaker.clouddriver:clouddriver-artifacts safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ