maven package report

Is io.micronaut:micronaut-inject safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
3.7

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-3rfq-4wpf-qqw3, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-3rfq-4wpf-qqw3

LOWCVE-2026-44242

ResourceBundleMessageSource maintains two caches: messageCache (bounded at 100 entries via ConcurrentLinkedHashMap) and bundleCache (unbounded ConcurrentHashMap). The bundleCache is keyed by (Locale, baseName) where the locale originates from the HTTP Accept-Language header. In applications that explicitly register a ResourceBundleMessageSource bean and serve HTML error responses, an unauthenticat

Affected
>= 4.10.0, < 4.10.22
Fixed in
4.10.22
Weakness
CWE-400
Published
2026-05-06
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:59 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-06. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is io.micronaut:micronaut-inject safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ