maven package report

Is io.jenkins.plugins:visualexpert safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-8mmh-h4jh-2g34, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-8mmh-h4jh-2g34

MODERATECVE-2023-24455

Jenkins visualexpert Plugin 1.3 and earlier does not restrict the names of files in methods implementing form validation, allowing attackers with Item/Configure permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system.

Affected
<= 1.3
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2023-01-26
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:45 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-01-26. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is io.jenkins.plugins:visualexpert safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ