maven package report

Is github.com/consensys/gnark safe?

2 known vulnerabilities.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rjjm-x32p-m3f7, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rjjm-x32p-m3f7

UNKNOWN

gnark provides a gadget in the standard library to allow optimized checking of the bitwidth of the inputs. The gadget works by constructing a fixed lookup table containing all valid entries, partitioning the input and checking that all parts are inside the lookup table. The range checker gadget did not take into account that the highest partition may be less than the width limit, allowing the inpu

Affected
>=0, <0.9.2
Fixed in
not stated
Published
2023-11-12
Source
osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:42 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-11-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/consensys/gnark safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ