maven package report

Is futures-task safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r93v-9p5q-vhpf, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r93v-9p5q-vhpf

UNKNOWNCVE-2020-35906

Affected versions of the crate did not properly implement a 'static lifetime bound on the waker function. This resulted in a use-after-free if Waker::wake() is called after original data had been dropped.

Affected
>=0.2.2-0, <0.3.6
Fixed in
0.3.6
Published
2022-05-24
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is futures-task safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ