maven package report

Is dev.dsf:dsf-bpe-process-api-v2 safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-xmj9-7625-f634, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-xmj9-7625-f634

MODERATECVE-2026-40942

DSF FHIR Server with enabled [bearer-token authentication](https://dsf.dev/operations/v2.1.0/fhir/oidc.html) or [back-channel logout](https://dsf.dev/operations/v2.1.0/fhir/oidc.html).

Affected
< 2.1.0
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-670
Published
2026-04-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-04-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is dev.dsf:dsf-bpe-process-api-v2 safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ