maven package report

Is com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.4

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-2j95-gqxf-v3vg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-2j95-gqxf-v3vg

CRITICALCVE-2026-11746

ZooKeeperReplicationConfig.secret() silently substitutes the hard-coded constant "ch4n63m3" (leetspeak for "change me") whenever the operator omits replication.secret. The same secret is wired into both the client-facing SASL context and the quorum/learner SASL contexts of the embedded ZooKeeper. The constant is in OSS source on GitHub and is discoverable via code search in seconds.

Affected
< 0.84.0
Fixed in
0.84.0
Weakness
CWE-798
Published
2026-09-11
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-11. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ