maven package report

Is com.liferay:com.liferay.server.admin.web safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p73j-gpcq-49h8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p73j-gpcq-49h8

HIGHCVE-2025-3594

Path traversal vulnerability with the downloading and installation of Xuggler in Liferay Portal 7.0.0 through 7.4.3.4, and Liferay DXP 7.4 GA, 7.3 GA through update 34, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to (1) add files to arbitrary locations on the server and (2) download and execute arbitrary files from the download server via the comliferayserveradminwebportletServerAdminPo

Affected
>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.67, >= 5.0.0, < 5.0.24, >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.48, < 1.0.93, >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.66
Fixed in
3.0.67
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2025-06-16
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:33 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-06-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is com.liferay:com.liferay.server.admin.web safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ