maven package report

Is com.liferay:com.liferay.search.experiences.service safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
2.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-cqwv-9xh5-25fg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-cqwv-9xh5-25fg

LOWCVE-2025-62247

Missing Authorization in Collection Provider component in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.9, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.16, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.19 allows instance users to read and select unauthorized Blueprints through the Collection Providers across

Affected
<= 3.0.84
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-862
Published
2025-10-22
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-10-22. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is com.liferay:com.liferay.search.experiences.service safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ