maven package report

Is com.liferay:com.liferay.portal.template.freemarker safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rggc-gf6w-9q73, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rggc-gf6w-9q73

MODERATECVE-2025-43825

A vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.4, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.5, 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows sensitive user data to be included in the Freemarker template. This weakness perm

Affected
>= 7.0.3, < 7.0.60
Fixed in
7.0.60
Weakness
CWE-201
Published
2025-10-04
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:56 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-10-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is com.liferay:com.liferay.portal.template.freemarker safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ