maven package report

Is com.itextpdf:itextpdf safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.8

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
5.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.2

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-gv87-q66h-4277, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-gv87-q66h-4277

CRITICALCVE-2021-43113

iTextPDF in iText before 7.1.17 allows command injection via a CompareTool filename that is mishandled on the gs (aka Ghostscript) command line in GhostscriptHelper.java.

Affected
< 5.5.13.3
Fixed in
5.5.13.3
Weakness
CWE-77
Published
2021-12-16
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so maven packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:32 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-13. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is com.itextpdf:itextpdf safe? maven package security report | CyberXYZ