go package report

Is kubevirt.io/kubevirt safe?

17 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.9

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7jcp-v9w4-wjmg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7jcp-v9w4-wjmg

CRITICALCVE-2026-7374

A flaw was found in KubeVirt's virt-handler component. This vulnerability allows an authenticated OpenShift user with edit permissions in a single namespace to exploit improper symlink validation when connecting to virtual machine console sockets. By replacing the console socket with a symlink to the host's container runtime (CRI-O) socket, an attacker can hijack virt-handler's privileged connecti

Affected
>=0, <1.6.6, >=1.7.0-alpha.0, <1.7.4, >=1.8.0-alpha.0, <1.8.3
Fixed in
1.8.3
Weakness
CWE-59
Published
2026-05-26
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:53 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-28. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is kubevirt.io/kubevirt safe? go package security report | CyberXYZ