go package report

Is github.com/uozi-tech/cosy safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity out of 10

      epss
      0.00%
      medium

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 46th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      0.0
      low

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-m468-xcm6-fxg4

      HIGHCVE-2026-33028
      // summary

      The nginx-ui application is vulnerable to a Race Condition. Due to the complete absence of synchronization mechanisms (Mutex) and non-atomic file writes, concurrent requests lead to the severe corruption of the primary configuration file (app.ini). This vulnerability results in a persistent Denial of Service (DoS) and introduces a non-deterministic path for Remote Code Execution (RCE) through configuration cross-contamination.

      // details

      The vulnerability exists because the settings update pipeline does not implement any synchronization primitives. When multiple requests reach the handler simultaneously:

      • Memory Corruption: ProtectedFill() modifies shared global singleton pointers without thread-safety, leading to inconsistent states in memory.
      • File Corruption: The underlying library (gopkg.in/ini.v1) performs direct overwrites. Concurrent write operations interleave at the OS level, resulting in app.ini files with empty leading lines, truncated fields, or partially overwritten configuration keys.
      • State Persistent Failure: Depending on which bytes are corrupted, the application either fails its "is-installed" check (redirecting to /install) or encounters a fatal error during boot/runtime that prevents the process from responding to any further requests.

      Environment:

      • OS: Kali Linux 6.17.10-1kali1 (6.17.10+kali-amd64)
      • Application Version: nginx-ui v2.3.3 (513) e5da6dd (go1.26.0)
      • Deployment: Docker Container
      // poc
      • Check original app.ini file valid state:
      • Log in to the nginx-ui dashboard.
      • Navigate to Preferences and update settings. Capture a POST /api/settings request and send it to Burp Suite Intruder.
      • Configure the attack with Null payloads (to test basic concurrency) or a Fuzzing list (to test data-driven corruption).
      • Set the Resource Pool to 20-50 concurrent requests.
      • Observation (In-flight corruption): Monitor the app.ini file. You will observe the file being written with empty leading lines or incomplete key-value pairs.

      - ------------------------------------------------

      -

      • Observation (Recovery Failure): If the service redirects to /install, attempting to complete the setup again often fails because the underlying configuration state is too corrupted to be reconciled by the installer logic.
      • Observation (Total Service Collapse): When the corruption in app.ini becomes so severe, the Go runtime or the INI parser encounters a fatal error, causing the Nginx-UI service to stop responding entirely (Hard DoS).
      • Observation (Cross-Section Contamination): During testing, it was observed that sometimes INI sections become interleaved. For example, fields belonging to the [nginx] section (like ConfigDir or ReloadCmd) were erroneously written under the [webauthn] section.

      Example of corrupted output observed:

      [webauthn]
      RPDisplayName  = 
      RPID           = 
      RPOrigins      = 
      gDirWhiteList  = 
      ConfigDir      = /etc/nginx
      ConfigPath     = 
      PIDPath        = /run/nginx.pid
      SbinPath       = 
      TestConfigCmd  = 
      ReloadCmd      = nginx -s reload
      RestartCmd     = nginx -s stop
      StubStatusPort = 51820
      ContainerName  = 
      // impact

      This is a High security risk (CWE-362: Race Condition).

      • Integrity: Permanent corruption of application settings and system-level configuration.
      • Availability: High. The attack results in a persistent Denial of Service that cannot be recovered via the web UI.
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE) Risk: Since the application allows updating certain fields (like Node Name) and uses others as shell commands (like ReloadCmd or RestartCmd), the observed "cross-contamination" of INI values means an attacker could potentially force a user-controlled string into a command execution field. If ReloadCmd is overwritten with a malicious payload provided in another field, the next nginx reload will execute that payload. While highly impactful, this specific exploit path is non-deterministic and depends on the precise interleaving of thread execution, making targeted exploitation difficult.
      // recommended mitigation
      • Implement Mutex Locking: Wrap the ProtectedFill and settings.Save() calls in a sync.Mutex to serialize access to global settings.
      • Atomic File Writes: Implement a "write-then-rename" strategy. Write the new configuration to app.ini.tmp and use os.Rename() to replace the original file atomically, ensuring the configuration file is always in a valid state.

      A patched version of nginx-ui is available at https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/releases/tag/v2.3.4.

      // cvss v4.0 vector

      CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Attack requirements
      None
      Privileges required
      High
      User interaction
      None
      Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
      Low
      Integrity (vulnerable system)
      High
      Availability (vulnerable system)
      High
      Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
      None
      Integrity (subsequent systems)
      None
      Availability (subsequent systems)
      None

      Checked 2026-09-28 at 19:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-30. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.