go package report

Is github.com/stacklok/toolhive safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.8

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qg2g-g9w3-m5h8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qg2g-g9w3-m5h8

HIGHCVE-2026-58197

A containerized MCP server running with the default network permission profile (insecureallowall: true) can reach host-local services via host.docker.internal. This includes the ToolHive API itself, other ToolHive-managed MCP server proxies, and any other service listening on the host's localhost. Combined with the unauthenticated ToolHive API and MCP proxy endpoints, this enables a compromised or

Affected
< 0.30.1, >=0, <0.30.1
Fixed in
0.30.1
Weakness
CWE-284
Published
2026-09-18
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:31 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-18. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/stacklok/toolhive safe? go package security report | CyberXYZ