go package report

Is github.com/operator-framework/operator-sdk safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MEDIUM.

cvss
6.4

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-856v-8qm2-9wjv, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-856v-8qm2-9wjv

MEDIUMCVE-2025-7195

Early versions of Operator-SDK provided an insecure method to allow operator containers to run in environments that used a random UID. Operator-SDK before 0.15.2 provided a script, usersetup, which modifies the permissions of the /etc/passwd file to 664 during build time. Developers who used Operator-SDK before 0.15.2 to scaffold their operator may still be impacted by this if the insecure userset

Affected
>=0, <0.15.2
Fixed in
0.15.2
Weakness
CWE-276
Published
2025-08-07
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:29 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-08-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/operator-framework/operator-sdk safe? go package security report | CyberXYZ